Layman's Lawyer
  • The judge let several lawyers who aren’t admitted in this court help with the case, which is what “appear Pro Hac Vice” means.
  • He also approved a plan for how the case will move forward, including deadlines to share information, the possibility of a jury trial lasting about 5–7 days, and rules to keep certain materials confidential, with various extensions and status updates noted in later filings.
  • 7/24/2026Notice · The court reporter has filed an exact written record of a court meeting from Jul…

    The court reporter has filed an exact written record of a court meeting from July 14, 2026. The people involved have seven days to tell the court they want parts of that record hidden; if they don’t say so, the record can be made publicly available without hiding anything after 90 days.

    Notice of Filing Transcript

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

    View original
  • 7/24/2026Transcript · This is a written record of the conference held on July 14, 2026, before Judge J…

    This is a written record of the conference held on July 14, 2026, before Judge J. Paul Oetken, prepared by court reporter Raquel Robles. You can read it for free at the court’s public terminal or buy a copy through the court reporter before the restriction release date; after that, you can get it on PACER. There is a redaction request due August 14, 2026, a redacted version due August 24, 2026, and the full, unrestricted copy becomes available on October 22, 2026.

    Transcript

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

    View original
  • 7/20/2026ImportantOrder · A judge approved the second written request for more time. Sean Combs must submi…

    A judge approved the second written request for more time. Sean Combs must submit his updated formal reply to the lawsuit and any new claims against the other side by August 11, 2026.

    Document 117

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

    View original
  • 7/20/2026
    Order on Motion for Extension of Time

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

  • 7/14/2026Minute · This is a short note about a phone meeting with Judge J. Paul Oetken on July 14,…

    This is a short note about a phone meeting with Judge J. Paul Oetken on July 14, 2026 to check on how the case is going. The transcript of that meeting is available to read.

    No description available

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

  • 7/14/2026
    Status Conference

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

  • 7/6/2026ImportantOrder · The judge, J. Paul Oetken, approved the request (motion number 112) to let an ou…

    The judge, J. Paul Oetken, approved the request (motion number 112) to let an out-of-state lawyer appear in this case for this case only (that’s what “pro hac vice” means: permission for a specific case). The order is a text-only ruling and was entered on July 6, 2026.

    Document 115

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

    View original
  • 7/6/2026
    Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

  • 6/25/2026ImportantOrder · A judge granted the request for more time. Sean Combs must file his updated repl…

    A judge granted the request for more time. Sean Combs must file his updated reply to the lawsuit and any counterclaims by July 21, 2026.

    Document 114

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

    View original
  • 6/25/2026
    Order on Motion for Extension of Time

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

  • 6/24/2026Sean Combs filed a formal request asking for more time to submit an updated answ…

    Sean Combs filed a formal request asking for more time to submit an updated answer and new counterclaims in the case. The request was written by Erica A. Wolff and sent to Judge J. Paul Oetken on June 24, 2026.

    Extension of Time

    Here’s the gist in plain words:

    • Sean Combs (the defendant) asked the judge for three more weeks to file an updated formal reply to the lawsuit and to add his own counterclaims (his own claims against the plaintiff) in that reply. All sides agreed to this delay.
    • This request follows a previous extension the court gave in mid-April 2026. The court had set June 30, 2026 as the new date for Combs to file his updated reply and counterclaims.
    • Combs is currently in prison at Fort Dix, and his lawyers could not reach him before the June 30 deadline. Because of that, they ask to postpone the deadline to July 21, 2026.
    • The lawyers say this small delay should not change any other deadlines in the case.
    • The request is filed by Sean Combs’s lawyers: Erica A. Wolff and colleagues.
    View original
  • 6/24/2026Notice · This is a notice about a request for Michael J. Fisher to be allowed to appear i…

    This is a notice about a request for Michael J. Fisher to be allowed to appear in this case as a temporary out-of-state attorney (pro hac vice means a lawyer not licensed here can help in a specific case). A $200 filing fee was paid, and the Clerk's Office will review the motion and supporting papers; they’ve checked and there are no problems.

    No description available

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

  • 6/24/2026
    Notice Regarding Pro Hac Vice Motion

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

  • 6/9/2026ImportantOrder · The court granted the two defendants’ requests to pause the June 12, 2026 deadli…

    The court granted the two defendants’ requests to pause the June 12, 2026 deadlines to answer the discovery questions called Requests for Admission. All lawyers must join a phone meeting on July 14, 2026 at 11:00 a.m. by dialing 855-244-8681 and entering the code 2312 828 7066 to discuss those requests.

    Document 111

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

    View original
  • 6/9/2026
    Order on Motion to Stay AND Order on Motion to Stay

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

  • 4/14/2026ImportantOrder · The judge granted the request to extend the time to gather information in the ca…

    The judge granted the request to extend the time to gather information in the case. The plaintiff must send a revised set of written questions by April 15, 2026, and provide privacy-safe medical-record release forms for the defendants by April 24, 2026; defendant Combs must file an updated answer that adds new claims by June 30, 2026; both sides must finish gathering facts and take sworn witness interviews (depositions) by December 18, 2026.

    Document 108

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

    View original
  • 4/14/2026
    Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

  • 1/15/2026A mutual agreement was approved that sets rules for how to handle confidential i…

    A mutual agreement was approved that sets rules for how to handle confidential information in the case. Judge J. Paul Oetken signed the order on January 15, 2026, making it official.

    Protective Order

    Here’s a plain-English summary of the filing:

    • The judge is issuing a Protective Order in a civil lawsuit brought by Rodney Jones against Sean Combs and several related parties. A Protective Order is a rule that keeps certain discovery materials private so they aren’t shared publicly.
    • The order lets everyone involved (the parties, their lawyers, experts, and certain third parties) keep confidential or specially designated materials secret during discovery (the pre-trial fact-gathering).
    • Some materials may already be covered by a separate Protective Order from an ongoing criminal case against Sean Combs. The civil case’s rules match and reference those criminal-case protections.
    • Materials can be marked and used as:
    • Confidential: private but allowed to share with certain people under the rules.
    • Sealed: kept even more private, with limited access.
    • Attorney’s Possession Only (APO): only the attorney can hold it.
    • Attorney’s Eyes Only (AEO): even more restricted, only the attorney can see it (not the parties).
    • How to mark and handle materials:
    • The person who produces the material can label parts as Confidential, Sealed, APO, or AEO.
    • Deposition transcripts can be designated Confidential and kept in a separate volume.
    • If something is later found to be confidential, the producer can re-label it and circulate updates to keep everyone aware.
    • Who can see or get confidential materials:
    • The parties, their insurers, and their lawyers.
    • Court-approved experts and witnesses who sign a non-disclosure agreement.
    • Court staff, mediators/arbitrators (if they sign the agreement), and certain service providers who help with the case.
    • How to handle disclosure to others:
    • Before sharing with a person listed above (like a consultant or expert), that person must read the order and sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement.
    • The order describes steps to prevent leakage and to address any accidental disclosure.
    • Management of personal and sensitive information:
    • The order has special rules for personal or highly sensitive data (like social security numbers or medical details) to keep it private and protected.
    • If someone asks for confidential material in a different case:
    • The receiving party must tell the person who produced it and may oppose the request if appropriate.
    • The order lasts beyond the case. After the case is finished, confidential materials should be returned or destroyed, unless the producing party says otherwise.
    • There are penalties for breaking the order. The court can punish violators who don’t follow it.
    • There are also related documents attached:
    • Exhibit A describes a separate protective order from the criminal case governing footnote materials (special electronic data) and how those must be stored and who can see them.
    • Exhibit B is a sample Non-Disclosure Agreement that people signing must agree to.
    • The filing confirms the parties agree to these rules, and the judge signs off to make them official.
    View original
  • 1/15/2026Sean Combs filed a draft order asking the court to keep some information private…

    Sean Combs filed a draft order asking the court to keep some information private. The filing was entered into the court system on January 15, 2026.

    Proposed Protective Order

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

    View original
  • 12/17/2025Notice · Benjamin Jared Shack Sackler filed a document saying he will represent Sean Comb…

    Benjamin Jared Shack Sackler filed a document saying he will represent Sean Combs in the case. The filing was entered in the court on December 17, 2025.

    Notice of Appearance

    This document is not yet available on PACER.

    View original

This is not legal advice. Layman's Lawyer summarizes public court filings for informational purposes only and does not represent you in any legal matter.